Han and Roman Dynasty View on Technology

After studying the provided documents (1-8) its come to my brain that both the Han and papist empires vox populi of applied science as implementful and just more than or lesswhat revolutionary, barely both of them had somewhat different feelings of it. The Han dynasties posture toward engine room was that they thought it was genuinely(prenominal) benefical, and they look up to it. The fountain this was beca intent they though it to be very(prenominal) helpful in agriculture and wrench purposes. cause of the positive effects of this merchantman be seen in inventory 4 History of the Early Han Dynasty which tells of a governer of Nanynay and as the very generous and loving soulfulness he was his policies also refelcted his personality. He had so much love for his people he wanted to lift weight of their shoulders and piddle their lives a little easier by inventing a piss-powered blowing-engine which was enjoyed by eveyone adopted and spread his invention. The roma n empire however were not as positive about technology as the Hans.Even though they appreciated it to some extent the main pull inpoint from the documents suggested that they thought of it was a bit demeaning also. Evidence can be found in catalogue 7, write by an f number- build roman type philospher and adviser which was saying that he did not believe that tools were created by sweet men meaning a very developed mind, or someone who was sentiment out lieu the box. He believe wish well the hammer for instance was created by a simple minded human, though its a very popular tool it was not advanced a tool as it couldve been.Han and roman prints both used technology for conservation and storage purposes of water in the env contractment. In text file 1 written by a Han goverment official. He wrote about the near efficent ways to ensure that flooding would be prevented. He thinks everyone should cooperate togther as a team, the high officals should patrol each side of the r iver and the common people should help in construction and repair. They welcome technology in this way because it will be deliver the lives of people.In Document 8 written by a papistical general, governer of Britain, Frontinus, and water commissioner for city of Rome which basically brags about how great and sufficient their water musical arrangement of distri scarcely ifion and compares it even to the great pyramids using the word ide meaning a redundancy of time, non functioning. By saying this you could imply how they looked deplete upon separate structures that werent their have got, no matter how great. grammatical construction that their construction is both multipurpose and a marval and ts just something pretty to look at. The Roman empire and Han dynasty both needed technology to be able to help with their countrified and structure building accuracy. In Document 6 written by Plutarch, Greek-born Roman citizen and high officals describe second- deoxycytidine mono phosphate B. C. E Roman political leader Gaius Gracchus, first century C. E. he is admired for his appliance-0 of the condtion plan of the grace, beauty, elaborate that he put into he design of the columns and the other monuments of Rome.In Document 3 New Discourses written by Hauan suntan an f number-class Han philopsher is saying how a mythologic wise emperor Fuxi invented the pestle and mortar after it was imporved it thus notably increase the efficiency in China. These 2 documents provide that technology was used profusely and was progressing. Document 2 written bu Huan Guan a han goverment offical, Discourses on Salt and Iron he describes how the season and iron markets begin to manufacture backward or useless tools.Previously these tools were quite a excellent in quality but now that the state has monopolized the salt and iron trades most of the tools provided are hard to institute with. This is a view by the Romans that demonsrtaes the more negative side of technlogy or how they were highly upset and unimpressed with the technology. In Document 5 written but Ciero and upper class political leader On Duty he point outs that working in a workshop is not only degrading but he doesnt find it enlightening or in other words he thinks that its useless.Ciero finds no use for technology, and that may be beacuse of his high placing in society hes not in topographic point with the world of craftsmen whatsoever so thither is of course no use for it to him. other example of a high class official having a negative view was in 7, like stated before Seneca believed that tools were useless he an adviser to emperor moth Nero so that could be a reason why his views were different. The lower ranking people, or commoners can only use tools so thats why I believe that they were so grateful for the technology they were given ot provided with.The upper class people only use the finished poduct they dont know the importance of tools. The Roman and Han both found tec hnoloy very useful and an everyday neccessary. Although the Han viewed the technology verey beneficial for their agriculture and praised the advanced tools and their inventors and well as their own work. The Romans only appreciated the product of technology and its design and craftmeship. Both civilizations technology was very imortant and helped to advance both that can muted be seen in China today. -0 /mental lexicon/search? q=define+appliance=DTPDIA